State secrets...? As a so-called ICANN Director (non-elected and planted by Esther Dyson and others) here are some cyberspace topics/questions you may want to spend more time on. [It appears that 99.9% of your topics are meat-space related and almost 100% of ICANN processes are meat-space oriented. Why is that ?] 1. It is common knowledge that Netizens connect to the 32-bit legacy transport using 32-bit Address Spectrum. 2. Address Spectrum is very similar to other spectrums commonly managed (in the US) by the FCC. 3. People motivated by selling new protocols, technology, and religious agendas are currently running around cyberspace claiming that they will soon no longer have any more "virgin" Spectrum to lease. [They make sure people do not notice the 10s of millions of dollars they have banked, which now allows them to retire for the next 20 years.] 4. A quick review of the 32-bit Spectrum shows that 50 of the 250 major allocations remain RESERVED. That is about 20%. Has the ICANN Board reviewed how well the other 80% is used ? --- Q1. What are those 50 Spectrum blocks RESERVED for ? Q2. What is the defined FAIR and OPEN process to obtain one or more of those Spectrum blocks ? Q3. What do companies pay ICANN per year for such Spectrum blocks ? Q4. How many, so-called, ICANN Directors know anything about Spectrum, the value of Spectrum, or about US FCC Spectrum Auctions ? Q5. Is the intention to make all of the Spectrum blocks below, Public Spectrum? Q6. Is it possible that so-called ICANN Directors "distract" people to meat-space topics to avoid dealing with cyberspace topics ? Q7. Is it true that the New ICANN Spin, for 2008, is that ICANN only does names, not addresses ? Q8. Is it also true that the New ICANN Spin is that all of the inter-locking of the same people profiting from names and addresses is "Pure Coincidence", and was not some small clique's intended result ? Q9. Is it true that the recent secret meetings in Aspen resulted in agreement that the US FCC will handle Spectrum Allocations ? Q10. Is it true that the US FCC plans to immediately out-source that Spectrum Management to one of the Northern Virginia spook companies that was home-grown by ICANN to handle such matters ? --- 000/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 001/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 002/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 005/8 Jul 95 IANA - Reserved 007/8 Apr 95 IANA - Reserved 010/8 Jun 95 IANA - Private Use A.NET 014/8 Jun 91 IANA - Public Data Network E.NET 023/8 Jul 95 IANA - Reserved 027/8 Apr 95 IANA - Reserved 031/8 Apr 99 IANA - Reserved 036/8 Jul 00 IANA - Reserved 037/8 Apr 95 IANA - Reserved 039/8 Apr 95 IANA - Reserved 042/8 Jul 95 IANA - Reserved 046/8 Dec 92 IANA - Reserved 049/8 Mar 98 IANA - Reserved 050/8 Mar 98 IANA - Reserved 100/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 101/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 102/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 103/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 104/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 105/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 106/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 107/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 108/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 109/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 110/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 111/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 112/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 113/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 114/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 115/8 Sep 81 IANA - Reserved 173/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 174/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 175/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 176/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 177/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 178/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 179/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 180/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 181/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 182/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 183/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 184/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 185/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 186/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 187/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved 197/8 May 93 IANA - Reserved 223/8 Apr 03 IANA - Reserved