I don't know that property rights is all that important to the current debate over network regulations. One can easily believe that unbundling is a social good without insisting on flattening the service space inside the network. Of course, "neutrality" has as many meanings are there are forms of influence, so I don't expect you people to be consistent in the way you define it, but the one I find most objectionable is this one. Have your fun with public financing, open access, unbundling and applying common carrier law in new ways and in novel venues, but when you dictate how network access providers have to manage flows that have different needs from the network, you've gone too far.