Search
OneWebDay
This Month
May 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Search Google
Re: Responding to Martin Geddes
by Richard Bennett
You write one of the most amazing things I've ever read: These are just bits we’re talking about. Making them into “service type” decides the question up front — they’re not services until the carrier decides to call them that. Wow, Professor. May I suggest that you ask a network engineer if this is remotely true? At issue in the COPE Act is the fact that some bits are in hurry while others aren't, and from this fact a number of service levels are readily apparent. If all bits were just bits, tiered levels of service wouldn't be an issue. And it's also the case that COPE only applies in areas where there is an incumbent cable franchise, so it's a competitive scenario in every case. Broadband may not be as diverse and competitive as we'd like, but under COPE it's hardly a monopoly.
Post comment:
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com