Search
OneWebDay
This Month
March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Search Google
Re: Testing IDNs
by Bret Fausett
You wrote: "From the end-user's perspective, whether you typed in susancrawford.test or [non-ascii script susancrawford].[IDN equivalent of .test], you'd go to the same place." I think that's not quite right. Let me give it a try. The alias is only at the TLD level, not the second-level. For an existing registrant, DNAME gives you new resolutions but only in mix matched pairs of .net and .IDN! and .IDN2, etc. In other words, you have scrawford.net. If Verisign does an IDN DNAME for .NET of the form ".IDN", then "scrawford" will point to the same place in both .NET and in .IDN. Now, "[non-ascii script susancrawford]".IDN would be a new registration. That registration would also resolve in .NET. But just because you have "scrawford.NET" does not mean that DNAME also would give you [non-ascii script susancrawford].[IDN equivalent of .test]. Does that make sense? It may make more sense if I draw a picture. -- Bret
Post comment:
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com