Search
OneWebDay
This Month
October 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Search Google
Re: HBO and coyright law
by bithead
How has the distinction between broadcast and non-broadcast been rationalized - based on what criteria? After all, cable is basically a broadcast, just over a different medium. The intelligence is sent from one originating broadcast station, and multiple stations tune in to receive at the same time. The encoding may be different, but the principle is the same, as is the nature of the receiving capacitive. I'm no legal expert, but I know the technology well enough to know that cable is a signal broadcast over a wire medium. I suppose one could argue that cable has the ability to restrict reception, but so do non-wire mediums like satellite. The distinction between broadcast and cable seems not based on the actually nature of the activity. I must be missing something.
Post comment:
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com