Hi Susan, No, it's actually rather disconcerning to see this "initiative" underway, and I'll predict on procedural grounds alone the petition will be quickly dismissed. The First Order was very carefully and narrowly crafted to provide minimal necessary forensic evidence needed not only for law enforcement but for critical infrastructure protection as well. The capabilities being sought are substantially less than exist worldwide - which is why virtually every significant product vendor has lawful interception solutions baked into the products already. To the extent that is not the case, an inexpensive access device does the trick. This is not "bowing to pressure from law enforcement," but rather doing what is needed for protection of the public and public infrastructure. It is why virtually every other government in the world has imposed requirements at least as extensive. --tony