Search
OneWebDay
This Month
July 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Search Google
Re: Re: SSSCA, CBDTPA, and BICCA: Acrimonious Acronyms
by Susan
Take a look at a(2). It allows providers to provide customized content -- which means blocking what isn't part of the package. And there's no obligation to provide uncustomized access. Sec. a(3) is a nullity if the provider isn't offering "naked" access as a choice. That's my reading.
Post comment:
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com