Congratulations to CDT (and particularly to John Morris) who, with the ACLU, bookstores, independent artists, and ISPs challenged the constitutionality of Utah House Bill 260 -- and won.  (June 2005 post about the complaint is here.)

House Bill 260, like the Pennsylvania statute challenged in the Pappert case, would have mandated that ISPs block sites deemed "harmful to minors" by the State AG.  And that AG could have acted without any judicial review, just deciding on his own that particular sites were "harmful."  The ISPs, in turn, would probably have blocked those sites by blacklisting IP addresses -- which would have blocked an enormous amount of perfectly lawful content (because sites are routinely co-hosted).

It's nice to have some good news once in a while.