The NPRM isn't out yet, the policy statement hasn't been issued, but Chairman Martin gives us these ringing words:

I have long believed that consumers should be able to use their broadband internet access service to access any content on the internet.[FOOTNOTE ONE]

[FOOTNOTE ONE]:  Subject, of course, to the bandwidth limits and quality of service terms of the particular Internet access service plan that they have chosen to purchase.

Watch how this works.  Martin first states an article of faith (beliefs as policy?), and then completely eviscerates its importance.  If no DSL provider is required to make basic access (unconditioned, uncustomized) available to consumers, and if service plans say "don't use any unapproved applications or devices," then it is meaningless to say that as a matter of policy users should have the right to access any content they want to. Because they won't be able to.  The cable/telco duopolists will treat them as passive recipients of packaged services, as they are with respect to the telephone and cable services these providers are used to selling.

Watch, also, for the meaninglessness of whatever policy is stated.  As Martin says:  "While policy statements do not establish rules nor are they enforceable documents, today’s statement does reflect core beliefs that each member of this Commission holds regarding how broadband internet access should function."

More faith-based policymaking.  We'll need more than principles for the open internet to survive.