As we head into more stormy discussions about the future of internet governance, let's keep in mind the differences between hierarchies (like governments) and networks (like the internet).

In a hierarchy, "subsidiarity" is solved by having higher levels be authoritative over the ones below.  In a network, nodes may not be "equal" (networks are usually scale free and subject to power laws), but no node decides for another. 

Hierarchies provide certainty and finality, both desirable things.  Networks make dynamic decisions in a constant ebb and flow of connections, each node vying for the attention of the others.

Hierarchies can last for a long time or can crumble when attacked at a sensitive place.  Networks can heal themselves by routing around broken connections.

Networks are "better" -- in terms of their potential for the creation of complexity -- than hierarchies.  Because of the competition for attention and deference that happens on networks, interesting variations and combinations can happen. In a hierarchy, variation depends on the creativity of the highest levels.  Biological developments -- evolution -- happen in networks.

And everything is biological in the universe.