Elliot Noss responds to the anonymous Reformation article here.
First of all, I didn't write the thing -- it was found nailed to the front door of my blog. And it does seem to be prompting some discussion, which is worthwhile.
But even though I didn't write it, I don't agree with some of Elliot's criticisms of it. I do think that ICANN's "everything not permitted is prohibited" default setting is the wrong way to go. I don't think registries are monopolies -- no more than any one car brand is a monopoly. Registries are competing -- hard. I do think that the internet community can ban things if they want to, through consensus.
But does every change a registry makes have to be approved in advance? If Elliot thinks the answer to that is "yes," why does this apply to .biz but not .de or .uk? If Elliot thinks registries need permission to do anything, who gave ICANN that power? How is that power constrained?
These are, to some extent, religious questions.
